In chapter one, The Abolition of Truth and Morality, Schaeffer accentuates the fact that the Biblical worldview and the Humanistic worldview can never produce the same results, but necessarily their opposite effects. This is because the base from which each operates is antithetical to one another. The former grounds all of reality on the infinite God of creation, who is absolute and from whom all things are measured, whereas the latter, bases reality on finite human beings, which are the measure of all things. The result of God being passé is that humanity loses its humanness and society and the state become ultimate. Here “Might Makes Right”. The humanistic worldview tells me, “You’re no different than a bug.” Hence, law (i.e., the state and society) arbitrarily become ultimate because their base is false.
In chapter two Foundations for Faith and Freedom, many key figures are presented as stalwarts in the founding of the USA. John Witherspoon, a Presbyterian minister, president of what is now known as Princeton University and the only clergy to sign the Declaration of Independence. Clearly the Judeo-Christian worldview based the signing and forming of this country understanding that there’s a law above the law, and that the lawgiver is God. After the revolutionary war Witherspoon is quoted, “A republic once equally poised must either preserve its virtue or lose its liberty.” This virtue was grounded on a Protestant Reformation view of reality. Many others helped shape the founding of this country, but of interest to me is the First amendment and its dual purpose.
First, its purpose was to assure that there was no nationally established church (i.e., there’d be no Church of the United States). Second, its purpose was also to assure that government should not impede or interfere with the free practice of religion, but its interpretation is reversed today. Separation of Church and State today is used to silence the church. The view is that religion is not to have a voice in influencing civil government in any way. So much for original intent!
In chapter three The Destruction of Faith and Freedom, we see that when the majority rules, “Might Makes Right,” absolutes don’t exist, society’s fabric is coming undone, and now sociological law is king. Now, the law and the courts are the vehicle for coercion which is based on a humanistic concept of reality. This worldview inescapably necessarily produces a final picture of reality diametrically opposed to the Christian worldview. We’re in tough times some thirty years later from this writing.
In chapter four The Humanist Religion reveals that through the Media the humanistic worldview is propagated with its naturalistic base and the dissenting voices are shut up being labeled as “un-enlightened, unreasonable, or even unscientific.” The Media not only distort reality but often make it up for a story. They are the unelected federal bureaucracy. Bias here blindly blinds.
In chapter five Revival, Revolution, and Reform affirms the gospel call’s impact in pre-revolutionary America to personal salvation and social action which its preachers thundered. We will never know how deeply their message afforded the founding of said country and unfortunately their contributions are conveniently set-aside. Sadly, our present day evangelical leadership doesn’t have the clarity and resultant back-bone in areas of social action that the preachers of the Great Awakening displayed. To forget their example only aides our voice and lives from not being salt and light.
Chapter six An Open Window stresses that windows seemingly open are superfluous when the laws waiting to be enacted are so anti-Christian/Jewish. Our passivity as seeing Christ as Lord over all creation has deeply hurt our voice in the public square of ideas which those in power will not without a vicious struggle go to all lengths to silence. I’m increasingly perturbed and beside myself.
In chapter seven The Limits of Civil Obedience reminds us that if Lex Rex is under Gods Law which is ultimate, then not to resist tyranny is evil. To not resist tyranny which is Satanic; is to oppose God who is holy. Wow! This is much to consider. Moreover, when our restrictions on education are the same as Russia’s who do not allow any view contrary to that which the state deems worthy (this is humanism), how then are we any different than they?
In chapter nine The Use of Force many Christians will find difficult because of their lack of understanding of living in a fallen world, not a utopian one. That is, civil disobedience has a place not only in the OT and NT but also in this country’s history. Engaging said acts must be done thoughtfully, courageously, tactfully, and lovingly. For it is one means in which the Gospel was ordained by God to flourish. At times it will be very costly—death to some, but then again for the Christian, our lives belong to God.