Like Water and Wetness Morality Can’t Be Separated From Legislation

The front of the US Supreme Court in Washington, DC. Completed in 1935, the US Supreme Court building in Washington, DC, is the first to have been built specifically for the purpose, inspiring Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes to remark, ÒThe Republic endures and this is the symbol of its faith.Ó The Court was established in 1789 and initially met in New York City. When the national capital moved to Philadelphia, the Court moved with it, before moving to the permanent capital of Washington, DC, in 1800. Congress lent the Court space in the new Capitol building, and it was to change its meeting place several more times over the next century, even convening for a short period in a private house after the British set fire to the Capitol during the War of 1812. The classical Corinthian architectural style was chosen to harmonize with nearby congressional buildings, and the scale of the massive marble building reflects the significance and dignity of the judiciary as a co-equal, independent branch of government. The main entrance is on the west side, facing the Capitol. On either side of the main steps are figures sculpted by James Earle Fraser. On the left is the female Contemplation of Justice. On the right is the male Guardian or Authority of Law. On the architrave above the pediment is the motto ÒEqual Justice under Law.Ó Capping the entrance is a group representing Liberty Enthroned, guarded by Order and Authority, sculpted by Robert Aitken. At the east entrance are marble figures sculpted by Hermon A. MacNeil. They represent great law givers Moses, Confucius, and Solon, flanked by Means of Enforcing the Law, Tempering Justice with Mercy, Settlement of Disputes between States, and Maritime and other functions of the Supreme Court. The architrave carries the motto ÒJustice the Guardian of Liberty.Ó The interior of the building is equally filled with symbolic ornamentation. The main corridor is known as the Great Hall and contains double rows of marble columns

“You can’t legislate morality” sounds like “You better not get wet if you jump into that ocean junior.”  That’s silly and lamentable.  By nature laws prescribe what one ought or ought not do.  Like water and wetness moral standards can’t be separated from their prescriptive design, nor can morality from any legislation.  Douglas Groothuis answers this issue succinctly, clearly and cogently.  Click

Happy pondering!

2 thoughts on “Like Water and Wetness Morality Can’t Be Separated From Legislation

  1. That was a great article, thanks for sharing it.

    This kind of thinking drives me crazy. When someone tells me “You can’t legislate morality” my answer to them is “We can’t Legislate morality? Of course we can and we do it all the time. By the way, you don’t think the Supreme court just legislated morality? They did, it is just a different kind of morality, one you agree with!”

    When bringing up that objection, I think most people are really saying to the religious person “You can’t force us by law to act the way your God wants us to.” That is an understandable objection, as nobody wants to be forced to behave in a manner they believe to be wrong. The irony is that much of our legislation IS based on the Judeo-Christian worldview. We love the morality based laws that keep people from killing us, robbing us, or raping us. Thank God, literally, for those laws!


We'd love to hear your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s